JDE vs SAP… JDE Wins On Total Cost of Ownership!
Nucleus Research has performed a TCO Case Study at an anonymous biotechnology firm and found that “SAP is more than four times more costly than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne“.
Author
Stewart Schatz
Career: Principal CNC Consultant for Syntax Systems Limited specializing Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and the technology that supports it.
Side Hustle: Owner/Operator of E1Tips.com
Location: Lancaster, PA USA
What I like to do: Invest in Family, Explore Technology, Lead Teams, Share Knowledge/Experience, Hunt, Hike, etc.
Average Rating
5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
4 thoughts on “JDE vs SAP… JDE Wins On Total Cost of Ownership!”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
More Stories
How to Use the CMDKEY Command to Manage Stored Credentials on Windows
The cmdkey command is a Windows utility that lets you create, delete, and manage stored credentials for network authentication. This is particularly useful…
How to Print a Directory Structure Using PowerShell: Step-by-Step Guide
If you need to print out the directory structure and list the files within, this PowerShell script will help you...
Windows God Mode… What!?!
Windows God Mode is a hidden feature in the Windows operating system that allows users to access all of the system’s control panel options and settings in a single place.
How To Test A SQL Server Connection
There is an easy way to test your SQL Server connection when running Windows without any special software. I found...
4 Lines To Export Outlook Rules To Excel/CSV Using PowerShell
I used to use a ton of Outlook Rules to organize the thousands of emails that I receive each day....
Get The Size & Record Count Of All Tables In A SQL Server Database
Use the SQL query below to display the size and record count of all tables in an SQL Server database....
would love to see the case study TCO – JD vs SAP.
Sorry about that. The link is there now.
send please
Sorry about that. The link is there now.